Current:Home > BackSupreme Court tosses House Democrats' quest for records related to Trump's D.C. hotel-LoTradeCoin
Supreme Court tosses House Democrats' quest for records related to Trump's D.C. hotel
View Date:2024-12-23 21:04:55
Washington — The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a court fight over whether House Democrats can sue to get information from a federal agency about its lease for the Old Post Office building in Washington, D.C., which was awarded to a company owned by former President Donald Trump.
The court's unsigned order dismissing the case and throwing out a lower court decision in favor of the Democrats came weeks after it agreed to consider the dispute, known as Carnahan v. Maloney. After the Supreme Court said it would hear the showdown between the Biden administration, which took over the case after Trump left office, and Democratic lawmakers, the House members voluntarily dismissed their suit.
The court battle stems from a 2013 agreement between the General Services Administration, known as the GSA, and the Trump Old Post Office LLC, owned by the former president and three of his children, Ivanka Trump, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump. Trump's company renovated the building, which sits blocks from the White House, and converted it into a luxury hotel, the Trump International Hotel. Trump's company ultimately sold the hotel last year, and it was reopened as a Waldorf Astoria.
Following Trump's 2016 presidential win, the top Democrat on the House Oversight Committee, the late Rep. Elijah Cummings, and 10 other members of the panel sent a letter to the GSA requesting unredacted lease documents and expense reports related to the Old Post Office. The lawmakers invoked a federal law known as Section 2954, which directs executive agencies to turn over certain information to the congressional oversight committees.
The law states that a request may be made by any seven members of the House Oversight Committee, and is viewed as an oversight tool for members of the minority party.
The GSA turned over the unredacted documents in early January 2017, but later that month, Cummings and three other House members requested more information from the agency, including monthly reports from Trump's company and copies of all correspondence with representatives of Trump's company or his presidential transition team.
GSA declined to comply with the request, but said it would review it if seven members of the Oversight Committee sought the information. Cummings and Democrats then followed suit, though the agency did not respond to his renewed request. It did, however, turn over information, including nearly all of the records sought by the committee Democrats, after announcing it would construe the requests, known as Section 2954 requests, as made under the Freedom of Information Act.
Still, Democratic lawmakers on the House Oversight Committee sued the GSA in federal district court, seeking a declaration that the agency violated the law and an order that the GSA hand over the records at issue. (Cummings died in 2019, and five Democrats who joined the suit are no longer in the House.)
The district court tossed out the case, finding the lawmakers lacked the legal standing to sue. But a divided panel of judges on the federal appeals court in Washington reversed, reviving the battle after concluding the Democrats had standing to bring the case. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit then declined to reconsider the case.
The Biden administration appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that the lower court's finding that members of Congress can sue a federal agency for failing to disclose information sought under Section 2954 conflicts with the Supreme Court's precedents and "contradicts historical practice stretching to the beginning of the Republic."
"The decision also resolves exceptionally important questions of constitutional law and threatens serious harm to all three branches of the federal government," Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar told the court in a filing (the court tossed out that decision with its order for the D.C. Circuit to dismiss the case).
The Justice Department warned that the harm allegedly suffered by the members of Congress — the denial of the information they sought — doesn't qualify as a cognizable injury under Article III of the Constitution.
"And our Nation's history makes clear that an informational dispute between Members of Congress and the Executive Branch is not of the sort traditionally thought to be capable of resolution through the judicial process," Prelogar wrote.
But lawyers for the Democrats urged the court to turn down the case, writing it "involves no division of authority requiring resolution by this Court, but only the application of well-established principles of informational standing to a singular statute."
"Moreover, it presents no recurring constitutional issue warranting this Court's attention. To the contrary, it involves a once-in-a-decade, virtually unprecedented rejection of a Section 2954 request," they wrote in court filings.
- In:
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (456)
Related
- As Northeast wildfires keep igniting, is there a drought-buster in sight?
- Parents of disabled children sue Indiana over Medicaid changes addressing $1 billion shortfall
- Nancy Pelosi asks for very long sentence for David DePape, who attacked husband Paul Pelosi with hammer
- Nicola Coughlan on what makes that 'Bridgerton' carriage scene special: 'It's sexy'
- Guns smuggled from the US are blamed for a surge in killings on more Caribbean islands
- Scottie Scheffler releases statement after Friday morning arrest at PGA Championship
- Teen Mom's Jenelle Evans Reportedly Obtains Restraining Order Against Ex David Eason
- Missouri inmate facing execution next month is hospitalized with heart problem
- Texas’ 90,000 DACA recipients can sign up for Affordable Care Act coverage — for now
- Ex-Honolulu prosecutor and five others found not guilty in bribery case
Ranking
- New 'Yellowstone' is here: Season 5 Part 2 premiere date, time, where to watch
- Cassie's Husband Alex Fine Speaks Out After Sean “Diddy” Combs Appears to Assault Singer in 2016 Video
- Singer Zach Bryan and girlfriend Brianna LaPaglia shaken after 'traumatizing' car accident
- Person charged in random assault on actor Steve Buscemi in New York
- Shocked South Carolina woman walks into bathroom only to find python behind toilet
- Flash floods due to unusually heavy seasonal rains kill at least 50 people in western Afghanistan
- Israel-Hamas war protesters temporarily take over building on University of Chicago campus
- John Oates opens up about legal feud with Hall & Oates bandmate Daryl Hall
Recommendation
-
Tesla Cybertruck modifications upgrade EV to a sci-fi police vehicle
-
Stockholm secret songs: Taylor Swift to perform three acoustic sets for Eras Tour
-
What Louisville police claim happened with Scottie Scheffler: Read arrest report details
-
A brief history of Knicks' Game 7s at Madison Square Garden as they take on Pacers Sunday
-
Inspector general finds no fault in Park Police shooting of Virginia man in 2017
-
North Korea continues spate of weapons tests, firing multiple suspected short-range ballistic missiles, South says
-
Report: Former Shohei Ohtani teammate David Fletcher used former interpreter's bookmaker
-
Potential signature fraud in Michigan threatens to disrupt congressional races